Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Juan Canuto Pettengill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 12 de Octubre Football Club. SarahStierch (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Estadio Juan Canuto Pettengill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a good faith search, failed to find any references that were capable of satisfying WP:N or WP:SIGCOV. While I note it was suggested on the PROD there were Paraguayan news sources, I have not been able to locate them. ManicSpider (talk) 11:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Being the football stadium of a WP:FPL-compliant team is enough for notability. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not aware of that policy. Would you be able to direct me to it please? I find it odd that it wouldn't require some significant, reliable sourcing. - ManicSpider (talk) 12:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if it's encoded in policy as much as it is standard practise. There won't be many teams who have played, or who are playing in, a WP:FPL league that don't have at least a very basic stadium article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it may not be policy, but it is certainly backed up by past AFDs and simple COMMONSENSE - a top-level stadium is notable. Article needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 18:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 12 de Octubre Football Club, without prejudice against re-creation when sources become available. As this one's relatively recently built, it might not be that difficult for someone with access to relevant newspapers to find enough info to construct a useful article. But without any evidence of that coverage, we can't make a useful article on the topic, and there's not much point spinning one line of information out from a relatively undeveloped football club article. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, I agree, it should be redirected until such a time when there are sufficient sources. Andrew³²⁷ 05:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.